<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Drorism* | Random Entries</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2008:/blog//1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="Drorism* | Random Entries" />
    <updated>2008-03-23T11:06:29Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Dror Poleg advises business and government organization on Communications, Strategy, and Online Marketing. He is currently based in Beijing, China. more


This is the 7th version of Drorism.com, online since 1996.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>36 Hours in Hong Kong &amp; Macau</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/dror_poleg/36_hours_in_hong_kong_macau.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=198" title="36 Hours in Hong Kong &amp; Macau" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2008:/blog//1.198</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-23T11:04:15Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-23T11:06:29Z</updated>
    
    <summary>				36 Hours in Hong Kong from Dror Poleg on Vimeo. Click on the link above for a larger version.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Dror Poleg" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="601" height="339" data="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=781291&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef">	<param name="quality" value="best" />	<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />	<param name="scale" value="showAll" />	<param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=781291&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef" /></object><br /><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/781291/l:embed_781291">36 Hours in Hong Kong</a> from <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/user296422/l:embed_781291">Dror Poleg</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com/l:embed_781291">Vimeo</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>5 Days in Japan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/dror_poleg/5_days_in_japan.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=197" title="5 Days in Japan" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2008:/blog//1.197</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-14T02:40:26Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-14T02:56:09Z</updated>
    
    <summary>				5 Days in Japan from Dror Poleg on Vimeo.
Click on the link above for a larger version.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Dror Poleg" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="601" height="339" data="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=689535&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef">	<param name="quality" value="best" />	<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />	<param name="scale" value="showAll" />	<param name="movie" value="http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=689535&amp;server=www.vimeo.com&amp;fullscreen=1&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=00adef" /></object><br /><a href="http://www.vimeo.com/689535/l:embed_689535">5 Days in Japan</a> from <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/user296422/l:embed_689535">Dror Poleg</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com/l:embed_689535">Vimeo</a>. Music from the compilation "STRANGE SONG BOOK-Tribute to Haruomi Hosono 2":<br/><br/>1. Hayashi Tatsuo + Humming Kitchen / Chow Chow Dog (チャウ・チャウ・ドッグ/林立夫 + ハミングキッチン) <br/><br/>2. Ki cell / Shimen Dōka (四面道歌/キセル)</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Chinese New Year Treat</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/chinese_new_year_treat.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=195" title="Chinese New Year Treat" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2007:/blog//1.195</id>
    
    <published>2007-03-08T03:30:38Z</published>
    <updated>2007-03-08T03:36:06Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Southern Weekend (Nanfang Zhoumo 南方周末), China&apos;s biggest and most influential weekly newspaper, published a special edition for Chinese New Year with photos and stories from across China. The special issue features three of my photos, and a short interview about my work and activities in China. A online version ( in Chinese ) is available here.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Southern Weekend (Nanfang Zhoumo 南方周末), China's biggest and most influential weekly newspaper, published a special edition for Chinese New Year with photos and stories from across China. The special issue features three of my photos, and a short interview about my work and activities in China. A online version ( in Chinese ) is available <a href="http://www.southcn.com/weekend/culture/200702160018.htm">here</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Is China Mobile dangling the ultimate cookie in Beijing’s face?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/mobile_and_wireless/is_china_mobile_dangling_the_u.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=182" title="Is China Mobile dangling the ultimate cookie in Beijing’s face?" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2007:/blog//1.182</id>
    
    <published>2007-01-03T05:58:49Z</published>
    <updated>2007-01-03T06:01:47Z</updated>
    
    <summary>China Mobile might be on its way home. The rumors have been around for a few weeks. On Sunday, Forbes and several other financial news outlets published an AFX story claiming “China Mobile Ltd is expected to start procedures to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Mobile and Wireless" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>China Mobile might be on its way home. The rumors have been around for a few weeks. On Sunday, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2006/12/31/afx3289998.html">Forbes </a>and several other financial news outlets published an AFX story claiming “China Mobile Ltd is expected to start procedures to launch an A-share initial public offering on the mainland in the first half of 2007”. The report was based on an earlier story published by 21st Century Business Herald, a popular Chinese business magazine. </p>

<p>The original 21st CBH story stated that China Mobile, currently listed in Hong Kong and New York, has already chosen underwriters and is likely to launch an initial public offering in the Yuan-denominated A-share market in Shanghai. </p>

<p>Xinhua, the Chinese Government’s news agency, republished the story with a little twist, <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2007-01/01/content_772983.htm">reporting </a>that “The booming Chinese mainland stock market will lure the country's largest mobile operator back from overseas bourses in the first half of next year…” .</p>

<p>On Tuesday, China Mobile spokesperson Rainie Lei denied and confirmed the rumors: “ I have not heard of any report regarding the A-shares listing application, but our management has previously said the company will go back to the China [stock] market for the listing.”</p>

<p>The Standard today <a href="http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=1&art_id=35305&sid=11567391&con_type=1">reports </a>most analysts are skeptical about the rumors’ validity, claiming the company does not need any cash and that operating through a Chinese company will increase costs. Analysts also add that such a move would require rarely seen flexibility from local regulators. </p>

<p>At face value, the move does not seem necessary or beneficial. Might there be another reason behind China Mobile’s flirting with this idea? </p>

<p>How’s this for a theory:</p>

<p>The Chinese government is currently “encouraging” more than a 130 state-owned companies who are listed abroad to come home. Shao Ning, vice director of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, told Xinhua that “By returning to the mainland stock market, State-owned companies would make the domestic capital market more valuable to investors and set examples of standard operation and corporate governance improvements for other home-listed firms”. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=goog&hl=en">China Mobile</a> is the world’ largest mobile carrier by subscriber. It has a market cap in excess of US$170 billion. It is bigger than <a href="http://www.google.com/finance?q=CHL">Google</a>. Bringing China mobile home could fuel a slow but steady wave of Chinese companies that will choose to go public in China, in RMB. At a second stage, we can expect China to encourage companies from neighboring countries to raise capital in this side of the Pacific. This has strategic importance for Beijing, especially bearing in mind that Asia is the world’s most populated continent and is the centre of the World Economy’s growth for the past and next ten years. </p>

<p>OK, so we know what’s in it for Beijing, but what’s in it for China Mobile? </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Wang Xudong, China’s Information Industry Minister, <a href="http://www.cctv.com/program/bizchina/20061230/101489.shtml">told </a>CCTV last week that the policy framework for third generation mobile operations will be completed in 2007. The Chinese Government will “introduce policies covering 3G access, tariffs, supervision and bandwidth”. In the same report, CCTV stressed that China is expected to push its home-grown 3G standard, TD-SCDMA, when issuing 3G licenses.</p>

<p>On the same day, Xinhua quoted “Experts” that believe that the Chinese Government will take this opportunity to “regroup domestic telecommunication operators through 3G license issuance.” </p>

<p>TD-SCDMA is co-developed by China’s Datang Technologies and Siemens. It will compete with W-CDMA and CDMA 2000 for supremacy in the Chinese market. Currently, the government is leaning towards giving the TD-SCDMA 3G license to China Mobile.  China Mobile prefers W-CDMA, as it will be simpler to integrate with its existing GSM network, and require a significantly smaller investment in infrastructure, personnel, and more. </p>

<p>Last month, Dai Zhong, China Mobile Deputy General Manager, told Xinhua the following: “We think that W-CDMA is better for China Mobile. TD is a Chinese 3G standard, so we should support this network, but we have the largest GSM network in China.”</p>

<p>David at <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/dwbmbeijing/iblog/SiHu/C1218306977/E20061209212824/">Silicon Hutong</a> points out that: </p>

<blockquote>“Despite suggestions elsewhere that China Mobile has caved-in to government pressure, the world's mobile giant still appears to be fighting a rearguard action against having the unproven, un-finalized, problem-ridden, politically-driven TD-SCDMA shoved down its throat. 
 <br/> <br/>
Money is power everywhere, and Beijing is no longer an exception to that rule. China Mobile is that rara avis: a very large state-owned enterprise that is listed offshore, leads the local market, and is spinning cash. It would be a huge mistake to underestimate the implicit clout CMCC carries as it pleads its case at the MII, the Ministry of Commerce, the National Development Reform Commission and elsewhere in town. TD-SCDMA developer Datang just doesn't punch that kind of weight. 
  <br/> <br/>
China Mobile wants W-CDMA, and it will fight to the burger to get it. In China's 3G evolution, bet on that, not on the whims of a coalition of techno-nationalists at the MII. “</blockquote>

<p>Fair enough. So how can China Mobile achieve that? Imagine a deal between China Mobile and the Chinese Government. A deal, which will help the carrier secure and enhance its position in the market while helping Beijing boost the local economy, facilitate sharing the wealth generated by this boost with the Chinese people, and cementing China’s status as an economic superpower ( and ultimately as the world’s ultimate economic superpower ). Muhahaha. </p>

<p>Can you imagine such a deal? I find it difficult, but I’m sure someone can. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Is Steve Ballmer the Deng Xiaoping of Microsoft?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/internet_in_china/is_steve_ballmer_the_deng_xiao.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=179" title="Is Steve Ballmer the Deng Xiaoping of Microsoft?" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006:/blog//1.179</id>
    
    <published>2006-07-31T09:16:05Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-06T01:17:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer called on the phantom of Mao Zedong while trying to convince the Wall Street Journal that the Redmond giant will flourish without Bill Gates at the helm: “There have been many companies who lost their greatness...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Internet in China" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer called on the phantom of Mao Zedong while trying to convince the Wall Street Journal that the Redmond giant will flourish without Bill Gates at the helm: </p>

<blockquote>“There have been many companies who lost their greatness post their founders. There have been many companies who went on to greater greatness after their founders.... When did China get great? China didn't get great under Mao Zedong. China got great under -- in the recent years -- probably got great under Deng Xiaoping.”</blockquote>

<p>Now, if Gates is Mao and Ballmer is Deng, does that make Larry Page Chen Shuibian?</p>

<p>Thanks to <a href="http://www.valleywag.com/">ValleyWag</a>, <a href="http://www.gawker.com/">Gawker Media</a>'s Silicon Valley Gossip Rag, for spotting this one.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>China and Iran caught in Israel&apos;s Wok</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/china_and_iran_caught_in_israe.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=178" title="China and Iran caught in Israel's Wok" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006:/blog//1.178</id>
    
    <published>2006-07-20T03:55:31Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-06T01:17:33Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Wok is a Hebrew-language blog about China, Israel and everything in between. Following the current commotion in Israel&apos;s northern border, The Wok published an article that examines the relation between events in the far and middle east. A full...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hawok.org/">The Wok</a> is a Hebrew-language blog about China, Israel and everything in between. Following the current commotion in Israel's northern border, The Wok published an article that examines the relation between events in the far and middle east. A full translation is available below. The original article (in Hebrew ) is available <a href="http://www.hawok.org/2006/07/post_15.html">here</a>.<br />
<blockquote><br />
The current round of violence in the north [ of Israel, D.P.]brings with it a tidal wave of opinions and analysis from our country's various commentators. Everyone is talking about Hezbollah, Lebanon, and Hamas. Some mention Syria. The brave ones point a flabby finger towards Iran. They talk about pressure from Europe, intervention from NATO, and the creation of a Saudi-Jordanian-Egyptian front. Didn't we forget someone?</p>

<p>As in other fields, the Israeli media reflects the dwellers of Zion's yearning towards the west - that group of civilized nations we see ourselves as a part of. Reality, on the other hand, is quick to remind us that we are rooted in the depths of the east. To the defense of the Israeli media we should note that most western journalists, as well as leaders, all seem reluctant to mix the matters of the Far East with those of the middle one.</p>

<p>So where is, after all, the connection? Without drowning in conspiracy theories, let us look at a few events from the last six months. Connect the dots.</p>

<p><strong>January 18th, 2006</strong> – Iran's Northern Drilling Company (NDC) signs an oil surveying agreement in the Caspian Sea with China Oilfields Services Ltd. The agreement, estimated at US33 billion, will enable Iran to expand its surveying efforts in the southern part of the Caspian Sea. Until then, Iran had no ability to survey potential oil fields deeper than 90 meters below sea level. A bit more than a year earlier, at the end of 2004, China and Iran sign a gas and oil estimated at US70 billion. As part of the agreement, Iran will supply China 250 million tonnes of liquid gas and 150,000 crude oil barrels a day for 30 years.</p>

<p><strong>April 3rd, 2006 </strong>– China signs an agreement to purchase uranium from, and cooperation in nuclear development with Australia. The agreement is one of the cornerstones of the developing free trade agreement between the two countries. In the agreement, China vouches to use the supplied Uranium for peace purposes, in accord with the nonproliferation treaty for nuclear technology.</p>

</blockquote>]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote><strong>June 15th, 2006</strong> – Mahmud Ahmadinejad, president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, is invited to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The organization was established in 2001 as an alliance between countries with military and natural resources – China, Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan - to counter-balance American influence in east and central Asia. In the past, western leaders and commentators expressed concern that the organization aspires to grow and become an eastern version of NATO.

<p>Along with Iran, delegates from Mongolia and Pakistan – two other prospective SCO members - were also invited to attend the summit. While the rest of the world is trying to pressure Iran to dump its nuclear weapons program, Ahmadinejad is received in Shanghai as a distinguished guest. During his visit, the Iranian president did not forget his friends from the middle east and used the stage he was given to call for an inquiry into the veracity of the holocaust.</p>

<p><strong>July 5th, 2006</strong> – North Korea launches six missiles as part of a testing of its military capabilities. One of the missiles has within it's range large parts of Europe and North America. The Americans, who were busy celebrating the 4th of July, were happy to hear that the testing ended in a failure. The South Korean Associated Press reports that 10 senior Iranian security officials were in North Korea to observe the experiment. According to the report, the officials arrived to North Korean through Beijing.<br />
<strong><br />
July 12th , 2006</strong> – The ultimatum given to Iran by the United Nations has reached its last day. The world gave Iran a choice between halting its nuclear activities and having the matter escalated to the UN's Security Council. That same morning, Hezbollah, an Iranian-funded terrorist organization, violates Israel's northern border, kills 8 soldiers and kidnaps two more.</p>

<p><strong>July 14th, 2006</strong> – An Israeli Navy ship is hit by an advanced Surface-Sea missile. The Chinese-made missile was upgraded in Iran and made its way to the hands of Hezbollah in Lebanon through Syria. Iran initially purchased 150 units of the missile after the first Gulf War in 1991 (not all of them reached their final destination). From 2000 and onwards, Iran has been working on an upgraded version of the Chinese missile in cooperation with North Korea. </blockquote></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Yahoo-eBay War Rages in China</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/yahooebay_war_rages_in_china.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=40" title="Yahoo-eBay War Rages in China" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006:/blog//1.40</id>
    
    <published>2006-06-25T07:01:01Z</published>
    <updated>2006-06-25T07:04:01Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Below is an excerpt from an article I co-wrote for Red Herring ( with Kaiser Kuo ). Get the full story here. BEIJING–Peace may have broken out between eBay and Yahoo in the United States, but one of the bloodiest...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Below is an excerpt from an article I co-wrote for Red Herring ( with Kaiser Kuo ). Get the full story <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=17056&hed=Yahoo-eBay+War+Rages+in+China">here</a>. </p>

<blockquote>BEIJING–Peace may have broken out between eBay and Yahoo in the United States, but one of the bloodiest battles on the web—the contest over China’s online auction space—rages on between their Chinese allies.

<p>Yahoo and eBay announced last week they’ll cooperate on their U.S. search, advertising, and online payment efforts (see Yahoo, eBay Ally on Ads). But that teamwork won’t extend to their affiliates in China, according to officials at the Asian operations.</p>

<p>Yahoo’s interests are tied with Alibaba.com, China’s leading online business-to-business platform, which owns auction site Taobao.com. Last August, Yahoo paid $1 billion in cash for a 40 percent stake in Alibaba as part of a $4-billion deal that gave Alibaba control over Yahoo’s operations in China (see Yahoo’s $4B Alibaba Move).</blockquote></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Yahoo! China in a tangle as mommy goes to bed with the enemy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/internet_in_china/yahoo_china_in_a_tangle_as_mom.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=177" title="Yahoo! China in a tangle as mommy goes to bed with the enemy" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006:/blog//1.177</id>
    
    <published>2006-05-26T08:34:15Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-06T01:17:08Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Red Herring reports today about a new alliance between eBay and Yahoo!, in a bid to “resist rivals like Google and Microsoft”: “The companies plan to expand an existing advertising and search relationship so that Yahoo becomes the exclusive third-party...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Internet in China" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Red Herring reports today about a new alliance between eBay and Yahoo!, in a bid to “resist rivals like Google and Microsoft”:</p>

<blockquote>“The companies plan to expand an existing advertising and search relationship so that Yahoo becomes the exclusive third-party provider of all graphic ads throughout eBay. Yahoo will also have an exclusive deal on some of the sponsored search results on eBay, though the extent of those was unclear. 
 
Yahoo is also going to provide more current links to items for sale on eBay for users who do their searches from Yahoo’s site.
 
As web-based advertising continues to prove its ability to bring in revenue, even web sites like eBay that have been strong e-commerce players are looking for ways to increase their profits from online ads and search.”</blockquote>

<p>From a global perspective, the possible benefits of such an alliance are clear. In China, on the other hand, it gives birth to a perplexing situation: eBay’s largest competitor in soon-to-be the world’s largest online market is TaoBao.com. TaoBao.com is owned by Alibaba.com. As it happens, Yahoo! owns 40% of Alibaba, and Alibaba is responsible for all of Yahoo!’s activities in China. </p>

<p>This means that Yahoo! China is both eBay's biggest competitor and its strategic partner. </p>

<p>The war between TaoBao.com and eBay.com is probably the bloodiest one in the short history of China’s internet.  Both companies are pouring money on advertising like there’s no tomorrow. eBay throws in the cash money it made in other countries, and TaoBao.com is spending the US 1 Billion its parent company received from Yahoo!.  eBay is lagging behind TaoBao and earlier this year was forced to change its business model and stopped charging sellers a transaction fee. </p>

<p>On the other front, the situation of Yahoo!’s Chinese search engine is even worse, as it holds a market share of less then 10% and lags far behind Baidu and Google. </p>

<p>So, is Yahoo! international in a position to force Alibaba’s Jack Ma to cooperate with eBay? I think not. Alibaba and TaoBao are leaders in their market, while Yahoo! China’s search engine is (still) no more than a small fish that happens to carry a familiar name. </p>

<div class="LinksAndSourcesHeader">Links and Sources</div>
<div class="LinksAndSourcesText"><ul>
<li>Infoworld: <a href="">EBay China decides 'free' is a business model</a></li>
<li>Red Herring: <a href="http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=16994&hed=Yahoo%2c+eBay+Ally+on+Ads">Yahoo, eBay Ally on Ads</a></li>
</ul></div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Bilingual brands: Love in the time of IKEA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/media_theory/bilingual_brands_love_in_the_t.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=176" title="Bilingual brands: Love in the time of IKEA" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006:/blog//1.176</id>
    
    <published>2006-05-06T01:13:08Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-06T01:16:46Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Is IKEA china playing love games with its local competitor? IKEA opened its first store in China in 1998. AIKA, one of its biggest local competitors, uses a brand name that is disturbingly similar to that of the Swedish giant....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Media Theory" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<div class="imgleft"><img alt="Agent AIKA, IKEA China, AIKA, AIJIA.jpg" src="http://www.danwei.org/IKEA-China---AIKA-AIJIA.jpg" width="160" height="160" /></div>Is IKEA china playing love games with its local competitor? IKEA opened its first store in China in 1998. AIKA, one of its biggest local competitors, uses a brand name that is disturbingly similar to that of the Swedish giant. 

<p>Things get even worse when looking at the two companies’ local brand names. IKEA’s Chinese name is YiJia (宜家), meaning something along the lines of “a proper home”.  AIKA’s Chinese name is AiJia (爱家), meaning a “loving home” or “love home”. It sounds almost the same as IKEA’s YiJia, but adds the “love” element. </p>

<p>A few weeks ago, IKEA opened a new store in Beijing. The campaign to promote the new store features a new catchphrase -  AiDeXinTiYan (爱的新体验). The official English version is “more to love” but the literal translation is closer to “a new experience of love”.  Some may see this as IKEA’s jab at AIKA, trying to appropriate the local competitor’s signature emotion. </p>

<p>But it seems that IKEA is not the only one chipping away at AIKA’s brand name. AIKA is also the name of a famous Japanese anime star. Absolute Anime, a site containing detailed information about anime characters, describes AIKA as: <blockquote>"a secret agent with the skills, the wits, and the little surprises to take on the impossible... Agent Aika is an action adventure full of pretty ladies, guns, action, drama, and a definite emphasis on the ladies: tons of panty shots and more than a little skin."</blockquote></p>

<div class="LinksAndSourcesHeader">Links and Sources</div>
<div class="LinksAndSourcesText">
<ul>
<li>Agent Aika on <a href="http://www.absoluteanime.com/aika/">Absolute Anime</a></li>
<li>IKEA China's <a href="http://www.ikea.com/ms/zh_CN/">official web site</a></li>
<li>Danwei TV 5: <a href="  http://www.danwei.org/danwei_tv/danwei_tv_5_sweden_has_landed.php">Sweden has landed</a></li>
<li>IKEA's "more to love" campaign on <a href="http://china.adage.com/article.php?article_id=48646">AdAge China</a></li>
</ul>
</div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Bilingual brands: Google China’s GuGe yarn continues</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/internet_in_china/bilingual_brands_google_chinas.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=37" title="Bilingual brands: Google China’s GuGe yarn continues" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006://1.37</id>
    
    <published>2006-04-27T08:39:41Z</published>
    <updated>2006-06-25T06:49:00Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Google doesn’t seem to draw much comfort from its activities in China. Earlier this year, the world’s largest media company copped some flak over the launch of Google.cn, a local version of its search engine that saves people the trouble...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Internet" />
            <category term="Internet Marketing" />
            <category term="Internet in China" />
            <category term="Search Engines" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google doesn’t seem to draw much comfort from its activities in China. Earlier this year,  the world’s largest media company copped some flak over the launch of Google.cn, a local version of its search engine that saves people the trouble of clicking through links that are inaccessible from China. A recent Keynote survey declared Google to be China’s “best search engine” as far as user experience goes, but the American giant is still trailing behind local rival Baidu, which controls roughly 50% of the local market (according to some surveys). </p>

<p>The latest episode in the Google China saga features the unveiling of the company’s local name,  GuGe, (pronounced Goo as in “goo” and Ge(r) as in “girl” without the “rl”). As multinational giants forage into new markets, they are required to add a local dimension to their identity and make it easier for consumers to pronounce and remember their brand names. Most Asian languages cater for foreign names: Thai, Korean, Indian, and Vietnamese all have phonetic alphabets, and the Japanese have Katakana, a syllabary (yes, this is an English word) script commissioned exclusively to accommodate foreign words and expressions. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>China is different. Chinese language boasts more than 50,000 symbols, of which many have more than one meaning and pronunciation. It is thus impossible to simply translate a brand name to sound the same as its foreign language original. The localization process requires companies to balance the phonetic and the poetic, to choose a name that sounds like its original foreign source while carrying a positive meaning.  </p>

<p>Successful examples include French retail giant CarreFour ( JiaLeFu, 家乐福, meaning a happy and fortunate household ),  IKEA ( YiJia, 宜家, meaning a proper home ); and Coca Cola ( KeKouKeLe, 可口可乐, meaning something along the lines of  “tasty and makes me smile”).  Less exciting examples are Siemens (XiMenZi, 西门子, meaning west gate ) and Pepsi ( BaiShi, 百事, meaning a hundred things or a hundred troubles ). </p>

<p>GuGe (谷歌), Google’s new Chinese name, comprises 谷 (gu3), meaning cereal or grain and also valley; and 歌 (ge1), meaning a song. Together, they mean “harvest song” or “song of the valley”. In choosing the characters, the good people at Google (apparently) wanted to connect to Chinese tradition, refer to successful reaping of results, and allude to the company’s origins in the (Silicon) Valley. </p>

<p>A fine effort, but the Chinese are not impressed. Local bloggers have been complaining that the name sounds old fashioned, uncool, and downright boring.  A bunch of them decided to exercise their freedom of association online and launched NoGuGe.com, a site featuring a petition calling on Google to rethink its new name. 10,743 people have signed it so far. The site also allows people to propose and vote for alternative names. </p>

<p></p>

<p>Popular suggestions include:<br />
狗狗 – GouGou, meaning Dog-Dog. This is currently Chinese people’s favorite way of referring to the baffled search engine.  Earlier this week, Google dwelled on the shortcomings of its canine nickname in reaction to queries from a local newspaper: "Names such as Gougou (dog dog) are unable to fulfill the responsibilities of a corporate, brand or product name, nor do they reflect fully our goals and mission."<br />
够了 – GouLe, meaning enough (is enough ). <br />
姑姑 – GuGu, meaning sister in law or aunt. <br />
割乳 – GeRu, meaning cut off/shave your breast. <br />
古狗 – GuGou, old dog. <br />
狗哥 – GouGe, dog-brother, or doggish old brother. <br />
孤狗 – GuaGou, an orphaned dog. <br />
千度 – QianDu, doesn’t sound exactly like the original, but keeps some of the meaning - "a thousand times" - while playing on the name of local competitor BaiDu ("a hundread times").   <br />
果果 – GuoGuo, double fruit. <br />
自由狗 – ZiYouGou, Independent dog.<br />
哥哥 – GeGe, older brother ( as opposed to Big Brother). <br />
呱呱 – GuaGua, the Chinese equivalent of quack-quack, the noise made by (Peking?) ducks.</p>

<p>Your correspondent has been trying to gather a few additional ideas from the rest of the Danwei team, but nothing substantial came up. Latest suggestions include: GuGao (顾告), which consists of the characters for the verbs “to consider/to look after” and “to inform”; and GuGao (固告),  which consists of the characters for “strengthening/solid” and the verb “to inform”. </p>

<p>The first one is about paying attention or looking after information, which is what Google is all about. The second one is about solid, reliable information. Both include Gao (告), which is a part of GuangGao (广告), the Chinese word for advertising., which could help enhance Google's local image as the world's largest advertising network. </p>

<p>Another idea came from Danwei’s cheeky neighbor, Imagethief, who suggested GuKe 锢客, loosely translated as “imprison your client”. Perhaps this name might be more suitable for Yahoo!, who was in the news again this week for allegedly being instrumental in the arrest of another journalist.    </p>

<p>As much as we would like to help, it seems the cause for Google’s trouble might lay in the hands of greater powers. Noam Urbach, a devoted Danwei reader from Jinan, points out that Google’s new name - which contains the Chinese word for grain or cereal - was launched during the Jewish holiday of Passover, a period in which God commanded the Jewish people: “Thou shalt have no grains within your borders for seven days”. So, there you have it. </p>

<p>Danwei readers are encouraged to suggest alternative names for Google China in the comments section. </p>

<div class="LinksAndSourcesHeader">Links and Sources</div>
<div class="LinksAndSourcesText">
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.noguge.com/">No Guge Web Site</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.noguge.com/signature.php?SignatureID=1">No Guge Petition</a></li>
<li>Guge a Gufe at <a href="http://news.imagethief.com/blogs/china/archive/2006/04/20/6485.aspx">Imagethief</a></li>
<li>Google #1 in China at <a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3578201">SearchEngineWatch.com</a></li>
<li>Google feels the wrath of Chinese surfers <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2006-04/21/content_573226.htm">China Daily</a></li>
<li>Yahoo helps China arrest another journalist at <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=31124">The Inquierer</a></li>
<li>Noam Urbach's spiel on <a href="http://www.nfc.co.il/archive/003-D-15413-00.html?tag=19-39-05">NFC web site (in Hebrew)</a></li>
</ul>
</div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Dao bless America: The Congress, China, and counter productivity.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/internet_in_china/dao_bless_america_the_congress.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4" title="Dao bless America: The Congress, China, and counter productivity." />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006://1.4</id>
    
    <published>2006-02-21T04:18:19Z</published>
    <updated>2006-05-25T23:37:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Imagine the following scenario: The American congress passes a bill that makes it practically impossible for American Internet companies to operate and compete in the Chinese market, in attempt to prevent censorship and spread freedom. The new law puts a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="International Affairs" />
            <category term="Internet in China" />
            <category term="Search Engines" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Imagine the following scenario: The American congress passes a bill that makes it practically impossible for American Internet companies to operate and compete in the Chinese market, in attempt to prevent censorship and spread freedom. The new law puts a serious dent in American companies’ ability to operate and compete in the Chinese market. In addition, the few publicly listed Chinese media companies that are not government-owned are also damaged, since most of them went public in the US and must comply with American laws. In the meantime, the Chinese people affirm their belief that America is out to harm them and hinder the development of their economy. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Now try this one: Multinational companies continue to develop services in China. The Chinese public is exposed to more and more information from other countries. China’s communication market becomes more open (slowly…) as more foreign and local money is invested inline with financial - and not political - imperatives. The people of China learn to appreciate the benefits of being a free market economy and just can't have enough...</p>

<p>The Internet develops faster than the laws that govern it. It is important for law makers to respond promptly to the challenges this development brings. But promptly should not mean hysterically, or sanctimoniously. Business is still business, and the market still knows best. New law(s) should draw clear lines on Internet companies’ responsibilities for activities the world over, starting with America. There are plenty of questions that need answering. Below are a few suggestions: </p>

<p>1. Are Internet companies obliged to provide Congress with information on users and usage, even for educational and research purposes? </p>

<p>2. Under what circumstances can American lawmakers request an Internet company to block access to copyrighted material (as it now does)? </p>

<p>3. What is the procedure for companies from other industries, less powerful than the Music Industry, to gain such protection?</p>

<p>4. What are the penalties for American Internet companies that currently block content by request from some European governments? What is the procedure by which these web sites are evaluated and selected?</p>

<p>In any case, China should not be singled out. Fellow Americans, have faith in the market’s wisdom. As the great sage Lao Zi wrote 2,500 years ago: </p>

<blockquote>
The Market abides in non-action, yet nothing is left undone.
If kings and lords observed this, the ten thousand things would develop naturally.
If they still desired to act, they would return to the simplicity of formless substance.
Without form there is no desire.
Without desire there is tranquility.
And in this way all things would be at peace.
</blockquote>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>China and the Internet: It’s access, stupid.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/international_affairs/china_and_the_internet_its_acc.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5" title="China and the Internet: It’s access, stupid." />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006://1.5</id>
    
    <published>2006-02-16T06:04:37Z</published>
    <updated>2006-05-25T23:37:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Representatives from technology giants Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, and Cisco Systems faced questioning at congressional hearings in Washington earlier this week. US lawmakers are increasingly concerned with the way in which companies from the Land of the Free cooperate with governments...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="International Affairs" />
            <category term="Internet in China" />
            <category term="Search Engines" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Representatives from technology giants Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, and Cisco Systems faced questioning at congressional hearings in Washington earlier this week.</p>

<p>US lawmakers are increasingly concerned with the way in which companies from the Land of the Free cooperate with governments that don’t share the American way. To be specific, Cisco’s part in setting up the Great Firewall of China and moves by Internet companies Google, Yahoo!, and MSN to censor content from search engines and blogs in China are under scrutiny.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
American companies are caught between the desire to expand and the need to abide by local laws and regulations in new markets. Google’s local version in France and Germany filters web sites that preach for racial hatred in accord with local laws. Even in the US, the law requires search engines to filter content from sites that breach copyright and intellectual property laws. </p>

<p>Chinese people today have access to a plethora of information, and hundreds of thousands of Chinese share their opinions online on topics that were considered taboo only a few years ago. Yes, some sites are blocked. Yes, some topics better be avoided. And yes, self-censorship is routine. But any tech savvy teenager could teach you a dozen ways to access a blocked web site, and, with all due respect, a news report about elections in America/Palestinian Authority or even the latest shenanigans of Brad and Jennifer advances the cause of freedom and normality much more than a photo of the Dalai Lama or the online manifesto of the FaLunGong. </p>

<p>The web, with or without Tibetan rebels or the BBC, is <i>the</i> main driver of change in China. Concerns should focus on the fact that currently only 110 million people in China have Internet access. This comprises the world’s second largest online market, but counts only for 10% of China’s population.</p>

<p>US lawmakers should keep that in mind when approaching China. It <i>is</i> necessary to set ground rules for U.S. companies operating abroad, but as far as China is concerned, the imperative should be to allow access to as many people as possible. After that, when 400 million Chinese citizens are online, leave it to the market to bring down the walls.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Jajah VoIP - Skype killer on the loose in China</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/voice_over_ip_voip/jajah_voip_skype_killer_on_the.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6" title="Jajah VoIP - Skype killer on the loose in China" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006://1.6</id>
    
    <published>2006-02-13T06:04:22Z</published>
    <updated>2006-05-25T23:37:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Last week saw the launch of Jajah.com, a new service that is set to revolutionize the way people use the Internet to make phone calls. The VoIP industry has been heating up for a good while, climaxing with eBay’s purchase...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="Voice over IP (VoIP)" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last week saw the launch of Jajah.com, a new service that is set to revolutionize the way people use the Internet to make phone calls. The VoIP industry has been heating up for a good while, climaxing with eBay’s purchase of Skype at the end of 2005. Skype’s software enables people to make PC to PC calls for free, and make PC to mobile/landline calls for competitive rates.</p>

<p>eBay paid billions of dollars to gain access to Skype’s technology and user base ( more than 250 million downloads to date). However, this is only the beginning. eBay makes money from facilitating trade. eBay users pay commission for sales they make through the site, sales leads, and for promoting their services on the web site. In the (near) future, a buyer could call a seller directly from eBay’s web site, using Skype’s technology. Imagine the increase in transactions this may bring.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is also the imperative behind Google’s GoogleTalk. Advertisers that pay for every visitor Google sends to their web site will be happy to pay even more for every client that rings them directly. Instead of the traditional model of paying per click or per sale, web sites will be able to charge advertisers for direct calls they receive from clients. PPC ( pay per click ) is dead, long live PPC ( pay per call ). Well, maybe one day. </p>

<p>Despite Skype’s popularity, VoIP is yet to become a mass product. Skype and similar services’ growth is hindered by several factors: <br />
 <br />
1.	They require users to download and install a software on their computer; <br />
2.	They require a functioning microphone and headset/speakers;<br />
3.	The voice and service quality varies in accord with the user’s internet connection;<br />
4.	Users still differentiate between “internet calls” and normal calls, and tend to use Skype for leisure and long distance calls, while sticking to a “real” phone for business calls.</p>

<p>Jajah.com offers quality VoIP service at low rates with a "twist" that enables it to overcome the aforementioned hindrances. The process is simple: A user visits Jajah’s web site, enters the number he wishes to call and his own mobile or landline number. Jajah then connects the two. Hence, the web is used to initialize the call, but the actual talking takes place on a normal phone. This eliminates the need for additional software or hardware and the dependence on the user’s bandwidth. The only bandwidth necessary is to send two phone numbers through an online form. In fact, a user does not even need a computer to make a call. Mobile internet users can visit Jajah.com and make calls from their mobile to other mobiles or landlines for low rates. </p>

<p>The service is already available in China, and a full Chinese version of the Jajah web site is expected in the near future. Jajah is backed by technology heavyweights  and it would not be surprising if its service will soon be integrated with one or two other Internet giants. Stay tuned for further developments. </p>

<p>Check out <a href="http://www.jajah.com/">Jajah.com</a> for more info and a test run.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Google China: Reshape one&apos;s foot to fit into a red shoe.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/internet_in_china/google_china_reshape_ones_foot.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=7" title="Google China: Reshape one's foot to fit into a red shoe." />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2006://1.7</id>
    
    <published>2006-01-26T20:09:40Z</published>
    <updated>2006-05-25T23:37:30Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A few years ago, Internet users trying to access Google.com from mainland China were redirected to a government approved search engine, usually powered by one of the local universities or by a state-owned company. These days, Google’s international services are...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="International Affairs" />
            <category term="Internet in China" />
            <category term="Internet in China" />
            <category term="Search Engines" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A few years ago, Internet users trying to access Google.com from mainland China were redirected to a government approved search engine, usually powered by one of the local universities or by a state-owned company. </p>

<p>These days, Google’s international services are normally accessible in China. The definition of normality, however, lies in the hands of the great leaders of the Middle Kingdom. And so, in times of national emergency, services such as Google news, GMail, and other web sites are suddenly inaccessible. In practice, routine events like protests in rural areas, toxic spills, floods, and the spread of Aviary Flu trigger blocks that disrupt access to information and personal communication.</p>

<p>Another thing that most people seem to forget, is that even when they are accessible from China, international search engines don’t always display the same search results to users in mainland China as they would to users in other countries. Search engines take into account each user’s geographical location in order to display the most relevant (and appropriate) search results. For example, a person in California that uses Google to search for “plumber” will see search results and text ads that are relevant to his area. In China, however, this and similar technologies are often used to deny local users access to information, even when using an international web site such as Google.com and Yahoo!. In the past, there have been reports from Chinese users that were not able to get any results for search terms such as “Jiang Zemin”, and even cases when a user’s internet connection would get disconnected for a few minutes or more. Any person living in China knows the feeling.</p>

<p>It is possible that the recent agreement between Google and Chinese authorities, and the consequent launch of Google.cn - hosted in China and catering specifically for the Chinese masses - will put an end to disruptions in access to Google’s international services. It is not less likely, however, that these disruptions will turn into a full block on all Google services not currently hosted within China. Only time will tell. In the mean time, denial of access to international web sites is not uncommon in China, as exemplified by the ongoing block of the BBC’s online news service and the free encyclopedia, Wikipedia.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Google’s argument that it is simply complying with local laws, as it does in any other country is fair. It is, however, important to note that local laws in the People’s Republic of China may change arbitrarily at any moment, and even in times of peace and normality, they include articles that would make the “Patriot Act” pale in comparison. This is not Google’s fault, and many other companies (and governments) do business with China in accordance with the same laws. </p>

<p>It is interesting to note that Google has filtered results in compliance with requests from the authorities of democracies in Europe and - probably - America. This earned Google a lot of public criticism in the past. Most critics did not censure Google for denying access to information ( mainly pertaining to racial hatred, pedophilia), but for the clandestine ways in which it has done so. The situation seems to be better today, mainly thanks to the public’s right to protest. A right that Chinese citizens rarely have the pleasure of exercising. </p>

<p>Delivering search results to web surfers is just the thin edge of the wedge. At the end of the day, in China or anywhere else, Google’s core business is to deliver audiences to advertisers.  Google is the world’s largest media company, but it would be inaccurate to call it a mass medium. Google provides its advertisers, members of the AdWords network, the ability to publish targeted text ads that are markedly more effective than “traditional”, untargeted, graphic ads. The ads are displayed next to search results on Google main search engine, on pages of other services such as GMail and Google News, and throughout a network of content web sites that are members of Google’s AdSense network. The more targeted and relevant the ads are to the user, the more he is likely to click on them and generate revenue for Google and its affiliate network.</p>

<p>In the past, the ads on display were determined according to the user’s search query ( on Google and Google-powered search engines ) or the content on the page the user was reading ( on the AdSense network ).  These days, Google also takes into account information it collects through other services. This includes previous searches through Google, Google-powered search engines, and the Google toolbar, Google News searches and alerts, GMail email messages, and more. Having as much information about its users as possible is one of Google’s basic business imperatives. More information, equals relevant ads, equals higher revenues.</p>

<p>GMail and Google News are not yet available as part of the new Google.cn package, but many Chinese citizens use these services ( when accessible ) on the main Google.com web site. Earlier this week, Google took great pride in refusing to share non-identifying statistical information about user search trends with US authorities. This is Google’s right under the American constitution. In China, that may not be the case. Many internet companies collect information on their users, but none of these companies depends on this information as much as Google does, and nobody does a better job than Google in collecting it. Now, combine that with China’s own tracking and filtering mechanisms. The fact that this is not Google’s fault does not make it any less disturbing. </p>

<p>But not all is gloomy. Chinese Internet users may not have the privilege to easily access information about their leaders, some of their history, and various religious or political groups. With some effort, however, there is plenty of information to be found. Hundreds of thousands of Chinese citizens vent their spleen on personal weblogs and bbs message boards. Despite the latest requirement for every web page author to register with the authorities, vigorous online discussions on anything from (certain aspects of ) rural unrest to the latest Louis Vuitton handbag take place under the Nanny’s open eye.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Marxism, Communication, and the Great Walls of China</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.drorism.com/blog/international_affairs/marxism_communication_and_the.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.drorism.com/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=171" title="Marxism, Communication, and the Great Walls of China" />
    <id>tag:www.drorism.com,2005:/blog//1.171</id>
    
    <published>2005-09-09T02:08:08Z</published>
    <updated>2006-08-06T01:13:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I recently revisited my copy of the Manifesto of the Communist Party. I was struck by the passage below, which is both clear and perplexing at the same time. How is it relevant in 2005? The answer is up to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dror Poleg</name>
        <uri>www.drorism.com</uri>
    </author>
            <category term="International Affairs" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.drorism.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<div class="imgleft"><img alt="Karl Marx" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/f/f9/Kmarx.jpg" border="0" title="What's on your mind, Karl?" /></div>I recently revisited my copy of the Manifesto of the Communist Party. I was struck by the passage below, which is both clear and perplexing at the same time. How is it relevant in 2005? The answer is up to you. 

<p><br />
“The bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian, nations into civilization. The cheap prices of its commodities are the heavy artillery with which it batters down all Chinese walls, with which it forces the barbarians’ intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate. It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilization into their midst, i.e., to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image.” </p>

<p><br />
Manifesto of the Communist Party, Karl Marx & Frederich Engels, 1848, p.6.<br />
Image from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx">Wikipedia</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

